Spaces:
Sleeping
Sleeping
Update TECHNICAL_NOTES.md
Browse files- TECHNICAL_NOTES.md +62 -53
TECHNICAL_NOTES.md
CHANGED
|
@@ -1,67 +1,76 @@
|
|
| 1 |
-
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
-
Interactive
|
| 4 |
-
This Space
|
| 5 |
-
|
| 6 |
-
|
| 7 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
-
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
-
|
| 12 |
-
1) Open the Space → **https://rftsystems-rft-omega-api.hf.space**
|
| 13 |
-
2) Select a **System Profile** (AI/Neural, SpaceX/Aerospace, Energy/RHES, Extreme Perturbation).
|
| 14 |
-
3) Adjust **Synthetic Noise Level (σ)** with the slider (0.00–0.30).
|
| 15 |
-
4) Click **Submit** → JSON output appears with live values for QΩ, ζ_sync, status.
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
-
|
| 18 |
-
|
| 19 |
-
|
| 20 |
-
|
| 21 |
-
|
| 22 |
-
|
| 23 |
-
|
| 24 |
-
"status": "perturbed"
|
| 25 |
-
}
|
| 26 |
-
```
|
| 27 |
-
|
| 28 |
-
---
|
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
-
|
| 33 |
-
|
| 34 |
-
|
| 35 |
-
|
| 36 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-
|
| 39 |
-
|
| 40 |
-
|
| 41 |
-
|
|
|
|
| 42 |
|
| 43 |
-
|
| 44 |
-
|
| 45 |
-
|
| 46 |
-
|
| 47 |
-
- **Extreme Perturbation:** σ up to 0.30 (stress testing / failure modes)
|
| 48 |
|
| 49 |
-
|
| 50 |
-
- The kernel applies **domain-specific weighting** (QΩ vs ζ_sync importance) and a **soft adaptive baseline** so repeated runs can show mild learning/self-stabilization.
|
| 51 |
-
- Outputs are **clamped to [0, 0.99]** to avoid saturation artifacts and to reflect realistic bounded metrics.
|
| 52 |
-
- Repeated runs at fixed σ typically show **< 0.05 variance** in stable regimes.
|
| 53 |
|
| 54 |
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 55 |
|
| 56 |
-
|
| 57 |
-
- **Benchmark harmonic resilience** under controlled perturbations (σ sweeps).
|
| 58 |
-
- **Study predictive drift signals**: observe how QΩ and ζ_sync diverge/converge as σ increases.
|
| 59 |
-
- **Profile-specific tuning**: compare AI vs Aerospace vs Energy domains with the same σ to see weighting effects.
|
| 60 |
|
| 61 |
-
|
| 62 |
|
| 63 |
-
|
| 64 |
|
| 65 |
-
|
| 66 |
-
|
| 67 |
-
**Author / Contact:** Liam Grinstead — [email protected]
|
|
|
|
| 1 |
+
Rendered Frame Theory — Stabilising System Verification Panel
|
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
+
Interactive verification panel for Rendered Frame Theory (RFT) harmonic stability under controlled synthetic noise.
|
| 4 |
+
This Space is a reproducible test harness for anticipatory stability (QΩ) and synchronisation coherence (ζ_sync) across multiple domains.
|
| 5 |
+
• Domains: AI/Neural, SpaceX/Aerospace, Energy/RHES, Extreme Perturbation
|
| 6 |
+
• Noise control: slider for σ (0.00–0.30) to probe robustness
|
| 7 |
+
• Outputs: JSON with mean QΩ / ζ_sync, status classification, and timestamp
|
| 8 |
+
• Logging: Save Run Log downloads a timestamped .json record for audit trails
|
| 9 |
+
• Reference DOI: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17466722
|
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
+
Live panel: https://rftsystems-rft-omega-api.hf.space
|
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
+
⸻
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
+
How to Use
|
| 16 |
+
1. Open the panel → https://rftsystems-rft-omega-api.hf.space
|
| 17 |
+
2. Select a System Profile (AI/Neural, SpaceX/Aerospace, Energy/RHES, Extreme Perturbation).
|
| 18 |
+
3. Choose Noise Distribution (gauss or uniform).
|
| 19 |
+
4. Adjust Synthetic Noise (σ) with the slider (0.00–0.30).
|
| 20 |
+
5. Click Run Simulation → JSON output appears with live QΩ/ζ_sync and status.
|
| 21 |
+
6. Click 💾 Save Run Log to download the result as a .json (timestamped).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
+
Example output
|
| 24 |
+
{
|
| 25 |
+
"profile": "AI / Neural",
|
| 26 |
+
"noise_scale": 0.080,
|
| 27 |
+
"distribution": "gauss",
|
| 28 |
+
"QΩ_mean": 0.834,
|
| 29 |
+
"ζ_sync_mean": 0.799,
|
| 30 |
+
"status_majority": "perturbed",
|
| 31 |
+
"timestamp_utc": "2025-10-29T14:04:05.114382Z",
|
| 32 |
+
"rft_notice": "All Rights Reserved — RFT-IPURL v1.0 (UK / Berne). Research validation use only. No reverse-engineering without written consent."
|
| 33 |
+
}
|
| 34 |
+
What to Expect
|
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
+
Typical stable ranges (nominal conditions)
|
| 37 |
+
Metric
|
| 38 |
+
Range
|
| 39 |
+
Meaning
|
| 40 |
+
QΩ
|
| 41 |
+
0.82–0.89
|
| 42 |
+
Harmonic stability factor (amplitude)
|
| 43 |
+
ζ_sync
|
| 44 |
+
0.75–0.88
|
| 45 |
+
Synchronisation coherence (phase)
|
| 46 |
+
Status classification (qualitative)
|
| 47 |
+
• nominal — low variance; coherent equilibrium
|
| 48 |
+
• perturbed — moderate variance; coherent but stressed
|
| 49 |
+
• critical — high variance; edge-of-instability
|
| 50 |
|
| 51 |
+
Noise guidance by profile (starting points)
|
| 52 |
+
• AI / Neural: σ ≈ 0.01–0.10 (training drift / GPU jitter)
|
| 53 |
+
• SpaceX / Aerospace: σ ≈ 0.03–0.12 (vibration / telemetry lag)
|
| 54 |
+
• Energy / RHES: σ ≈ 0.02–0.10 (grid oscillations / load steps)
|
| 55 |
+
• Extreme Perturbation: σ up to 0.30 (stress testing / failure modes)
|
| 56 |
|
| 57 |
+
Notes
|
| 58 |
+
• The panel applies domain-specific weighting (relative importance of QΩ vs ζ_sync).
|
| 59 |
+
• Outputs are bounded to [0.00, 0.99] to prevent saturation artifacts and maintain comparability.
|
| 60 |
+
• Repeated runs at fixed σ typically show < 0.05 variance in stable regimes.
|
|
|
|
| 61 |
|
| 62 |
+
⸻
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 63 |
|
| 64 |
+
Validation Purpose
|
| 65 |
+
• Benchmark harmonic resilience under controlled perturbations (σ sweeps).
|
| 66 |
+
• Study predictive drift signals: observe divergence/convergence of QΩ and ζ_sync as σ increases.
|
| 67 |
+
• Profile-specific tuning: compare AI vs Aerospace vs Energy with identical σ to see weighting effects.
|
| 68 |
|
| 69 |
+
For deeper collaboration (e.g., xAI / RobustBench / GLUE-style testing), this panel can be extended with dataset hooks and richer logging while keeping internal parameters sealed under RFT-IPURL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 70 |
|
| 71 |
+
⸻
|
| 72 |
|
| 73 |
+
Rights & Contact
|
| 74 |
|
| 75 |
+
All Rights Reserved under RFT-IPURL v1.0 and the Berne Convention (UK Copyright Law).
|
| 76 |
+
Author / Contact: Liam Grinstead — liamgrinstead2@gmail.com
|
|
|